Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

By use case

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Solutions

Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCPQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inTry the FHIR sandbox →Request access →
Fonteum · Compare

Looking for a ProviderTrust alternative for exclusion screening?

ProviderTrust is a healthcare compliance company that sells continuous exclusion, sanction, and license monitoring through a demo-led enterprise contract. Fonteum is the source-provenanced data layer underneath that job: it screens an uploaded roster against the full

OIG LEIESource: https://oig.hhs.gov/exclusions/exclusions_list.asp · Dataset: oig-leie/v1 · Snapshot: 2026-05-01
, SAM.gov, and 17 state Medicaid exclusion lists, and returns a signed, chained attestation PDF you can drop into an audit file. Public data only; no PHI.

Published June 19, 2026 · Last reviewed June 19, 2026 · Fonteum Research

Get a free roster screen →or read how exclusion screening works →
Side-by-side comparison

Fonteum vs ProviderTrust

Fonteum vs ProviderTrust
DimensionProviderTrustFonteum
Lists screenedMarkets continuous monitoring across federal and state exclusion lists, OFAC, and license boards as part of a compliance suite.OIG LEIE + SAM.gov + 17state Medicaid exclusion lists, plus OIG Corporate Integrity Agreement and CMS civil-money-penalty flags as a separate “compromised-anywhere” layer.
Monitoring cadenceContinuous / monthly monitoring is the marketed model.Each federal and state list is re-pulled on its own published cadence (LEIE monthly, SAM daily, state lists weekly–monthly) and the snapshot date travels with every match.
Signed, chained attestationReturns a screening result inside the platform; the cryptographic basis of a given result is not publicly documented.Every roster screen ships an Ed25519-signed, hash-chained attestation PDF — the match, the source file, the snapshot date, and the methodology version, re-derivable from the public record.
Federal source citationExclusion data is consumed inside the product; the originating federal file and date are not surfaced field-by-field.Every match carries its source URL, dataset id, snapshot date, and SHA-256 — the auditor sees the federal record itself, not a derived verdict.
Pricing modelPricing is not publicly listed; access is quote-gated through a sales demo.Public sanctions data is free; the production pilot is published as a flat range ($2,500–$5,000/mo) with a 30-day no-penalty exit.
Self-serve vs demoDemo-led enterprise onboarding.Self-serve: upload a roster and get a free same-day screen across OIG-LEIE + SAM + every state Medicaid list, with the signed attestation PDF attached. No demo required.

Comparison reflects each provider's publicly described product category and posture as of the review date above. Where a vendor does not publish pricing, the cell says so rather than estimating. Fonteum names no figure it cannot source to a federal record.

What Fonteum does differently

The audit-defensible exclusion screen, built on the federal record

Compromised-anywhere, not single-list

A federal-only screen misses a provider excluded by a single state Medicaid program who has since relocated. Fonteum screens OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and 17 state Medicaid lists together, and flags OIG Corporate Integrity Agreements and CMS civil money penalties as a separate monitoring layer.

Signed attestation an auditor can re-derive

CMS expects you to show which list you screened against, on what date, and the matched record. Fonteum's attestation is an Ed25519-signed, hash-chained document — the screening basis is the federal file itself, re-derivable, not a black-box result.

Open data, transparent pricing

The /sanctions surface and the underlying federal lists are free, because the source records are public works. You pay only for roster scoping, throughput, and the FHIR API — at a published price, not a quote.

FAQ

Common questions

How is Fonteum different from ProviderTrust?
ProviderTrust is a healthcare compliance company that sells continuous exclusion, sanction, and license monitoring as a demo-led enterprise platform. Fonteum is the source-provenanced data layer beneath that job: it screens a roster against the OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and state Medicaid exclusion lists, and returns a signed, hash-chained attestation in which every match traces to its federal source file, snapshot date, and methodology version. The boundary is real — ProviderTrust runs ongoing compliance workflow; Fonteum makes the underlying screening basis traceable to the federal record and prices it transparently.
What lists does Fonteum screen against?
Fonteum screens against the (federal healthcare exclusions), SAM.gov (federal debarment), and 17 state Medicaid exclusion lists, combined into a single “excluded-anywhere” signal. A separate “compromised-anywhere” layer surfaces OIG Corporate Integrity Agreements and CMS civil money penalties — active federal monitoring short of exclusion. Every match carries its source URL, dataset id, and snapshot date.
What does a Fonteum attestation contain?
Each roster screen produces an Ed25519-signed, hash-chained PDF listing every provider screened, the lists checked, the snapshot date of each list, any match found, and the methodology version. Because the signature chains to a published key and the source records are public federal files, an auditor can re-derive the result end to end rather than trusting a vendor's clean-or-excluded verdict.
Does Fonteum publish pricing?
Yes. The public sanctions surface and the underlying federal lists are free. The production pilot is published as a flat range ($2,500–$5,000/mo) with a 90-day term and a 30-day no-penalty exit. ProviderTrust does not publicly list pricing; access is quote-gated through a sales demo. See /pricing for tier detail.
Can Fonteum integrate with our credentialing system?
Yes. Beyond the free downloads, the pilot exposes exclusion data through a FHIR R4 US Core API with SMART Backend Services auth and HL7 bulk export. The exclusion signal rides on the resource with its federal source citation, so a credentialing or payer-integrity platform can pull status on a schedule and keep the source citation for its audit trail. Fonteum supplies the traceable data; it does not run your re-credentialing calendar.
How often does CMS require exclusion screening?
The OIG recommends screening employees and contractors against the LEIE monthly, because the list is updated monthly and the civil monetary penalty for employing an excluded person accrues per item or service. Fonteum aligns each list's refresh to the source cadence and stamps every match with the snapshot date, so a monthly screen is documented against the exact federal file in force that month. See the exclusion-screening guide.
Request access

Screen your roster against every list — free.

Upload your provider roster and get a free same-day full-roster screen across OIG-LEIE + SAM + all 17 state Medicaid lists, plus a signed attestation PDF. No PHI, no demo.

Get a free roster screen →or browse the public sanctions data →
See also
  • /screening → How to screen for OIG, SAM, and state Medicaid exclusions — the full guide.
  • /compare/verisys-alternative → Verisys alternative for OIG LEIE exclusion monitoring.
  • /compare/symplr-alternative → symplr alternative for exclusion and sanctions screening.
  • /compare/exclusion-screening-vs-single-list-checks → Why a multi-list screen beats checking one list.
  • /data/state-exclusions → The federal + state “excluded anywhere” data hub.
  • /sanctions → Public OIG LEIE aggregate surface, free to browse and cite.

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research
Research hubHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
67reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures